Does strength training really help climbers? This new review explains how resistance training affects climbing performance, injury risk, and training efficiency.
Read MoreWhat do imaging studies reveal about how climbing affects young fingers? This study breaks down adaptations, early injuries, and what coaches should know.
Read MoreIs your critical force test setting training intensities too high? This new study reveals how CFmin and CF720 may offer more sustainable metrics for climbers.
Read MoreA new study suggests critical force (CF) testing may outperform %MVC for assessing finger fatigue in climbers. Learn what it means for your training.
Read MoreA new study suggests that low-load hangboarding like the 'Abrahangs' protocol may build finger strength. But is it as effective as heavy loading? Here's what climbers need to know.
Read MoreLearn which body position offers the most reliable way to test finger strength for climbers—based on a study of four climbing-specific protocols.
Read MoreAre your finger strength tests accurate? New research explores the best climbing-specific testing methods for reliability and performance.
Read MoreLearn how maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) differentiate elite sport climbers. Insights from a 2021 PLOS ONE study on climbing-specific strength.
Read MoreExplore the impact of campus board training frequency on bouldering performance and climbing-specific metrics like strength, endurance, and explosive power. This study reveals how two vs. four weekly sessions affect advanced and elite climbers, offering insights into optimizing training for peak performance while minimizing injury risk.
Read MoreDiscover how 4 weeks of targeted finger grip training enhances explosive strength and force development in elite climbers. Get the full training breakdown.
Read More